Mathematical methods of aerospace monitoring, assessment of their demand in the study of natural resources: part two – hydrocarbon deposits

Authors

  • Oleksander Arkhipov Scientific Centre for Aerospace Research of the Earth of the Institute of Geological Science of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine”, Olesia Honchara str., 55-b, Kyiv, 01054, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2986-6185
  • Oleksandr Fedorovskyi Scientific Centre for Aerospace Research of the Earth of the Institute of Geological Sciences of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Olesia Honchara tr., 55-b, Kyiv, 01054, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3611-546X
  • Anna Khyzhniak Scientific Centre for Aerospace Research of the Earth of the Institute of Geological Sciences of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Olesia Honchara str., 55-b, Kyiv, 01054, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8637-3822
  • Alla Bondarenko Scientific Centre for Aerospace Research of the Earth of the Institute of Geological Science of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Olesia Honchara str., 55-b, Kyiv, 01054, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2257-6196

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36023/ujrs.2026.13.1.292

Keywords:

aerospace geomonitoring, systems analysis methods, optical and geophysical anomalies, geofluid dynamic and neotectonic processes, morphometric studies, structural interpretation, photometry

Abstract

The article addresses a current issue: the justification for applying certain proposed mathematical methods to the processing of remote and ground-based spectrometric data on plants and soils. These methods, previously tested in various oil and gas exploration tasks, are considered alongside established direct approaches (geophysical, geochemical, biological, etc.) under diverse geological and landscape conditions. Based on a systematic approach, several mathematical techniques for aerospace geomonitoring of natural resources, including hydrocarbons, have been developed or adapted.
For over thirty years, researchers at Scientific Centre for Aerospace Research of the Earth of the Institute of Geological Sciences of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine have tested dozens of well-known and proprietary techniques for processing plant and soil spectrometry data collected through remote sensing and ground-based research. These include factor analysis, spectral contrast methods, analytical networks, structural and texture analysis, interdisciplinary integration of aerospace and ground-based data, and a systematic approach. Additionally, heuristic criteria and decision-making methods have been applied for detailed assessments of the oil and gas potential of specific onshore areas.
Based on expert evaluations and the hierarchy analysis method described in Part 1, the most effective methods were identified. These include: a statistical method for detecting landscape optical anomalies associated with hydrocarbon deposits using aerospace imagery, the spectral contrast method, the spectral autocorrelation method, and a multicriteria optimization method.
These techniques are detailed in this article, with examples of their application in hydrocarbon exploration and the results of their evaluation in various geological and landscape settings.

Authors contribution: Conceptualization – O. I. Arkhipov, O. D. Fedorovsky; methodology – O. I. Arkhipov, O. D. Fedorovsky, A. V. Khyzhnyak, formal analysis – O. I. Arkhipov, A. V. Khyzhnyak, systematization, visualization – O. I. Arkhipov, A. V. Khyzhnyak, preparation of the text of the article: author's manuscript – O. I. Arkhipov, A. V. Khyzhnyak, review and editing – O. I. Arkhipov, A. V. Khyzhnyak, A. D. Bondarenko, visualization – A. D. Bondarenko. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding: This research was carried out within the framework of the research project “Development and improvement of methods and technologies of geospatial modeling to solve thematic problems of remote sensing”, registration number 0123U100684.

Data Availability Statement: Data available on reasonable request from the authors.

Acknowledgements: The authors are grateful to the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine for supporting this research. We are also grateful to the reviewers and editors for their valuable comments, recommendations, and attention to the work.

Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest

References

Alam, T., Kwon, H., & Lee, J. (2020). A review on genetic algorithm: Past, present, and future. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 79(23–24), 15253–15286.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-10139-6

Arkhipov O.I., Stankevich S.A., Titarenko O.V. (2009). The boundaries of hydrocarbon deposits mapping by ground spectrometry data. Theoretical and applied aspects of geoinformatics, no. 6, pp. 123-131. URL: jnas.nbuv.gov.ua/article/UJRN-0000176818

Daw, R. H. (1970). The Advanced Theory of Statistics. By M. G. Kendall and A. Stuart. Volume 1, Distribution Theory (Second Edition) 1963. Pp. xii + 433, Price 84s. Volume 2, Inference and Relationship. 1961. Pp ix + 676. Price 132s. Volume 3, Design and Analysis, and Time Series. 1966. Pp. ix + 552. Price 136s. London: Charles Griffin & Co., Ltd. Journal of the Staple Inn Actuarial Society, 19(01), 72–77. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020269X00008276

Fedorovskiy A. D., Artyushenko M. V., Kozlov Z. V. (2004). Parametric synthesis of the Earth sensing space systems based on the genetic method. Space science and technology, 10(1), 54–60.

Khyzhnyak, A. V., Yefimenko, T. A., Arkhipov, O. I., Tomchenko, O. V., Sukhanov, K. Yu., Fedorovskyi, O. D. (2016). Heuristic methods for evaluating areas of oil and gas promising territories based on interdisciplinary integration of aerospace and ground information (on the example of the Dnieper-Donets Depression). Ukrainian Journal of Remote Sensing of Earth, (9), 12–21. DOI: 10.36023/ujrs.2016.9.75

Khyzhnyak, A. V., Arkhipov, O. I., Fedorovskyi, O. D., Yefimenko, T. A. (2017). Search for hydrocarbon deposits based on the analysis of space and ground information using multi-criteria optimization and analytic network processes (on the example of the Dnieper-Donets Depression). Reports of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, (7), 56–63. https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/126799.

Lukin, A.E. (2004). Direct oil and gas prospecting: reasons of failures and ways to improve efficiency. Geologist of Ukraine.. No. 3, pp. 18–43.

Merriam, D.F. Development, significance, and influence of geomathematics: Observations of one geologist. Mathematical Geology 14, 1–10 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01037443.

Pererva, V.M.; Lyalko, V.I., Arkhipov, A.I. et al. (1995). Direct search of oil and gas deposits by remote sensing methods. National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Centre for Aerospace Research of the Earth. Prepr. Kyiv.

Popov M.O., Тopolnytskyi М.V., Titarenko O.V., Stankevich S.A., Аndreiev А.A. (2020). Forecasting gas and oil potential of subsoil plots via co-analysis of satellite, geological, geophysical and geochemical information by means of subjective logic. WSEAS Transactions on Computer Research, vol. 8, pp. 90-101. DOI: 10.37394/232018.2020.8.11

Schowengerdt R.A. (2007). Remote Sensing: Models and Methods for Image Processing. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 560 p. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-369407-2.X5000-1

Sedlerova O.V., Arkhipov A.I., Golubov S.I., Bondarenko A.D. (2021). Experimental priming of unmanned aerial vehicles for forecasting oil and gas promising facilities. Ukrainian Journal of Remote Sensing of the Earth. 8 (3), 49–57.

Siddique, A., & Adeli, H. (2017). Nature-inspired computing: An overview and some future directions. Cognitive Computation, 9(5), 701–715. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-017-9502-z

Stankevich S.A., Titarenko O.V. (2008). Optimization of the ground spectrometry data at mapping of inter-phytosynthetic anomalies. Scientific Vissnik of the National Agrarian Univercity, (128). Kyiv: NAUU, 312–319.

Stankevich S.A., Titarenko O.V. (2013). Multi-segment oil and gas deposit edge detection by high-dimensional spectrometric data. Journal of Information, Control and Management Systems, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 145-154.

Stankevich S.A., Titarenko O.V, Svideniuk M.O. (2019). Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS-based weight-of-evidence modelling in Central Georgian regions. Proceedings of International Scientific Conference “Natural Disasters in Georgia: Monitoring, Prevention, Mitigation”. Tbilisi: Mikheil Nodia Institute of Geophysics, pp. 187-190. URL: openlibrary.ge/handle/123456789/8668

Yakimchuk, V. G., Levchik E. I., Sukhanov K. Yu., Porushkevich A. Yu., Fedorovskiy A. D. (2012). Determination of informative features in reflection spectra and laser-induced fluorescence of vegetation cover for aerospace monitoring of the earth surface. Dopovidy National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, (1), 132–136.

Published

2026-03-30

How to Cite

Arkhipov, O., Fedorovskyi, O., Khyzhniak, A., & Bondarenko, A. (2026). Mathematical methods of aerospace monitoring, assessment of their demand in the study of natural resources: part two – hydrocarbon deposits. Ukrainian Journal of Remote Sensing, 13(1), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.36023/ujrs.2026.13.1.292

Issue

Section

Techniques for Earth observation data acquisition, processing and interpretation